Prebid proposed its own plan: how the open auction is preparing to take Google's place
Prebid presented its "Auction Flip" plan at Prebid Summit: Google should become a participant in the auction rather than its arbiter, after the court refused to split its business.

Author: Sergey Melnik
Prebid has unveiled a plan that would help Google meet the court's requirements — without splitting its business. The announcement took place at the annual Prebid Summit conference this week. The company proposed, in effect, to "swap places" with Google in the logic of the advertising auction.
What happened in court?
The court refused to order Google to divest its SSP and ad server (SSP — a supply-side platform that runs the auction of ad impressions; an ad server — a system that stores creatives and decides which banner to show). This means Google keeps both key technologies within one structure.
However, the court's requirements have not gone away. Google must change how its systems interact with each other in auctions. And this is where Prebid comes in — an open, nonprofit header bidding technology (header bidding — a mechanism in which multiple advertising systems compete simultaneously for an impression even before the main auction).
Takeaway: the court did not break up Google's structure, but it forced the company to change the mechanics — and Prebid offered its own version of those changes.
What exactly is Prebid proposing?
The idea has the working name "The Auction Flip." The essence is to swap the roles of Google and Prebid in the bidding chain.
Today the logic works like this: the Prebid auction runs first, and then its result goes into Google's ad server, where the final decision is made. Critics have long pointed out: whoever controls the final decision controls the outcome of the auction.
Prebid's proposal flips the scheme. Now it is Google that would have to pass its result into an open auction, where the final decision would be made by an external system. Put simply: Google goes from being the master of the auction to one of its participants.
Takeaway: Prebid's plan moves the point of final decision-making from Google's closed system into an open technology.
Why does the market need this?
For publishers and agencies, the issue of auction transparency is not an abstraction. The closer a system sits to the final decision, the more opportunities it has to influence the price of an impression and whose advertising wins.
Prebid's open-source code is the opposite approach. Any market participant can verify how the bidding logic works. This is precisely what makes the proposed plan a candidate to become an industry standard following the court's ruling.
For now, this is only a plan. Implementation would require Google's consent, technical rework of both systems, and time. But the very fact matters: for the first time, the industry is offering the court and regulators a ready technical alternative, not just a list of grievances.
Takeaway: Prebid turned an antitrust requirement from a legal formulation into a concrete engineering task.
What's next?
Two other topics were discussed at the same Prebid Summit. The first — how brands use their own data in a world of agentic AI systems (agentic systems — programs that autonomously carry out multi-step tasks, including purchases). The second — the growth in the number of AI "employees": companies are increasingly framing artificial intelligence as a separate work role.
Both topics point to the same thing: the advertising market is restructuring around automated decisions. And the question "who controls the auction" is becoming just the first of many.
Source: AdExchanger
More from Сергей Мельник
179 articles
Related articles
- Elvis Presley Song Rights Holders Demand $41.1 Million from Anthropic
- Pinduoduo and Anthropic paid Kazakhstan 8 billion tenge in taxes
- Disney Will Show Super Bowl 2027 Through the Eyes of Star Wars Characters
- Mom's Touch to Open 50 Restaurants in Kazakhstan with Shin-Line
- Prada answered AI slop with a pencil: 6 million views and mice in the style of Disney