Estonian court rules lawsuit against Äripäev newspaper to be a 'gagging writ' — an attempt at silencing
An Estonian court has ruled a businessman's lawsuit against Äripäev to be SLAPP abuse and ordered him to pay a deposit covering the newspaper's costs. The demand to remove data from an old article was rejected.

A court in Estonia has qualified the lawsuit filed against the business newspaper Äripäev as an abuse of legal proceedings aimed at suppressing public debate — a so-called SLAPP suit (in Estonian, 'vaigistushagi'). Äripäev reports this.
The court ordered the businessman who filed the claim to pay a deposit covering Äripäev's expected legal costs. In its ruling, the court stated that the lawsuit was initiated in connection with the newspaper's participation in public debate and constitutes abusive litigation.
The litigation was prompted by an old publication. An Italian businessman, once involved in watch trading and convicted of money laundering, demanded the removal of his personal data from an archived article. The court dismissed this demand.
Paradoxically, the data deletion lawsuit itself triggered an investigation that uncovered several identities behind the businessman with an international reach. Journalists established that in the past he had been punished for money laundering and used so-called 'clone banks' to swindle people out of their money.
According to the publication, the businessman, who uses passports under different names, has, like a spider, spun a web spanning numerous countries. Through this network, Äripäev writes, money is extracted from gullible citizens and then laundered through various channels.
Äripäev's lawyer Karmen Turk (Karmen Turk) commented to the newspaper. She explained how the court may proceed in such disputes. The full content of the comments and the circumstances on the basis of which the court concluded that businessman Marcus Nilsson's (Marcus Nilsson) lawsuit against Äripäev was of a SLAPP nature is set out in an article available to the publication's subscribers.
The case is notable for the entire Baltic business press: it establishes practice for countering so-called 'gagging suits', where individuals mentioned in investigations try to achieve the removal of archived publications through the courts. In this case, the Estonian court sided with the media, ordering the plaintiff to compensate in advance the defendant's expected legal costs.
The article was updated on 07.09.2026.
Source: Äripäev Turundus
More from Анна Соколова
153 articles
Related articles
- Elvis Presley Song Rights Holders Demand $41.1 Million from Anthropic
- Pinduoduo and Anthropic paid Kazakhstan 8 billion tenge in taxes
- Disney Will Show Super Bowl 2027 Through the Eyes of Star Wars Characters
- Mom's Touch to Open 50 Restaurants in Kazakhstan with Shin-Line
- Prada answered AI slop with a pencil: 6 million views and mice in the style of Disney